Midpage

What to ask before you buy

1. What is the price, and is it per seat?
2. How do I verify a citation before I rely on it?
3. Does the no-training commitment cover every model provider?
4. Which data region processes my queries?

Limits in the record

• It is a research surface, so it does not cover drafting or review work.
• The vendor does not publish a firm-size scope in the checked source.

How it sits in Legal research

Inside legal research, this is one of the newer entrants alongside vLex Vincent. CoCounsel and Lexis+ AI are the established alternatives. The difference worth checking is disclosure: this one publishes a detailed security page, which not every research tool does.

Reading the vendor’s wording

The vendor states that agreements with AI model providers do not permit those vendors to train on customer data, that data is encrypted at rest with AES-256 and in transit with TLS 1.2 or higher, and that controls are validated by annual SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA audits. This is one of the fuller disclosures in the research category.

How to evaluate it in a trial

1. Ask for the price and whether it is per seat.
2. Take a question you know the answer to and check whether the citation holds up.
3. Confirm the no-training commitment covers every model provider.
4. Ask which data region processes your queries.

What adopting it costs

It is a research surface rather than a system of record, so adopting it does not replace matter management. It can sit alongside an existing research platform, which lowers the switching risk.

Closest alternative

vLex Vincent AI — The closest newer research entrant. Both publish security detail; the difference is the content library behind the answers.