Practice management AI
CasePeer
Personal injury case management covering treatment, documents, and timelines.
Last observed 42 days ago. Records are treated as awaiting re-check after ninety days.
Only some data-handling statements were found. The checked sources did not contain all three of a confidentiality, training, and data-location statement. That is a gap in what the vendor publishes, not a finding about the product. Ask the vendor directly, or weigh it however your firm sees fit.
Editorial assessment
Personal injury case management covering treatment and medical records.
This section is the CounselAtlas editorial desk’s own reading of the dated facts below. It is not a vendor statement, not a rating, and not a recommendation. Every product fact it rests on is recorded with a source in the record.
What it is
A case-management platform built for personal injury practice, covering tasks, timelines, documents, and medical treatment tracking.
What it is not
It is not a general practice-management platform. Its workflow is built around personal injury cases rather than general practice.
Who it tends to fit
- Personal injury firms that need treatment and medical record tracking
- Firms that want case management shaped around PI workflow
- Firms already using other products in the same group
Who it tends not to fit
- General practice firms, since the workflow is PI-specific
- Firms that need billing and trust accounting as the primary feature
- Firms that need a published data-handling statement before shortlisting
What to ask before you buy
- How does the treatment tracking connect to medical record sources?
- What does the platform cover beyond case management?
- Where is my firm's data hosted?
- What does migrating from my current system involve?
Limits in the record
- The checked pages do not publish a confidentiality, training, or data-location statement.
- The workflow is personal-injury specific, so the record does not treat it as a general platform.
- The record covers case management rather than the wider practice.
How it sits in Practice management AI
This is the practice-specific option in the category. It competes with general platforms by fitting PI workflow rather than by covering more practice areas.
Reading the vendor’s wording
The checked pages describe the personal injury case-management features but do not publish a confidentiality, training, or data-location statement. Because the platform holds medical treatment records, a firm should ask those questions directly.
How to evaluate it in a trial
- Test the treatment tracking against a real personal injury matter.
- Ask where firm and client data is hosted.
- Confirm the export format for case data and medical records.
- Check what the platform covers beyond case management.
What adopting it costs
The switching cost is the case history and treatment records held in the platform. A firm leaving should confirm it can export case data and medical records in a usable format.
Closest alternative
Filevine — The closest alternative. Both handle litigation case management; Filevine publishes a security and compliance section that CasePeer does not.
The record
Everything below is a dated observation from the vendor’s own published material. Each line links to the page it came from so you can confirm it yourself.
What we verified
- Vendor
- CasePeer. Observed September 21, 2026 · Vendor page ↗
- Price path
- Public price: Vendor publishes a pricing page. Observed September 21, 2026 · Source ↗
- What it does
- Personal injury. CasePeer presents personal injury case management covering tasks, timelines, documents, and medical treatment tracking. Observed September 21, 2026 · Source ↗
- Firm-size scope
- Not stated. Observed September 21, 2026 · Checked page ↗
- Connections
- Not stated. Observed September 21, 2026 · Checked page ↗
- Data location
- CasePeer is part of the 8am family alongside MyCase, LawPay, and DocketWise.. Observed September 21, 2026 · Source ↗