COMPARISON · General-purpose assistants
Fireflies.ai vs Grammarly Business
General-purpose assistants compared on retention and training statements. Neither is legal-specific. This page places vendor-published facts side by side. It does not rank the products or state which is better.
| Fact | Fireflies.ai | Grammarly Business |
|---|---|---|
| Category | General-purpose assistants | General-purpose assistants |
| Vendor | Fireflies.ai | Grammarly |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Price path | Public price: Vendor publishes a pricing page. | Public price: Vendor publishes a pricing page. |
| Confidentiality statement | “SOC 2 Type II. Fireflies follows industry standards for data security, privacy, and confidentiality.” | “Grammarly’s SOC 2 (Type 2) report validates our controls based on the security, privacy, availability, and confidentiality trust services criteria.” |
| Training or data-use statement | No-training commitment: “Zero Data Retention. Your data is never used for AI training or any purpose outside your direct business needs.” | No-training commitment: “Data encryption. Grammarly encrypts all data in transit and at rest. Data transfer is protected using the industry-standard TLS 1.2 protocol, while data at rest in AWS is encrypted using AES-256 server-side encryption.” |
| Firm-size scope | Not stated | Not stated |
| Named connections | Not stated | Not stated |
| Data location | Encryption. 256-bit AES encryption for meeting notes and transcripts at rest, and TLS encryption for data. | An industry-leading infrastructure provider, AWS is certified as compliant with ISO 27001 and has received a SOC 2 (Type 2) report. |
| Last checked | September 21, 2026 | September 21, 2026 |
Every value above is a dated observation from the vendor’s own published material. Open either tool page for the full evidence ledger and source links.
Editorial assessment, side by side
The rows below are the CounselAtlas editorial desk’s own reading, not vendor statements. They restate what each vendor published and add no claim of its own. Neither column is a rating or a recommendation.
| Assessment | Fireflies.ai | Grammarly Business |
|---|---|---|
| Reading the vendor's wording | The vendor states that data is never used for AI training or any purpose outside direct business needs, that meeting notes and transcripts are encrypted at rest with 256-bit AES and in transit with TLS, and that it holds SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and HIPAA compliance. The zero-data-retention position is stated plainly. | The vendor states that data is encrypted in transit and at rest, that transfer uses TLS 1.2 and storage uses AES-256, and that its SOC 2 Type 2 report covers security, privacy, availability, and confidentiality. It does not publish a training statement in the checked source. |
| What adopting it costs | It is a meeting-capture tool rather than a system of record, so adopting it does not replace matter management. The switching cost is low, though it raises a consent question for recorded client meetings. | It is a writing assistant rather than a system of record, so adopting it does not replace matter management. The switching cost is the firm's own usage policy for what may be pasted into it. |
| Closest alternative | Grammarly Business — The closest general assistant. This one captures meetings; Grammarly improves writing. Both are not legal-specific. | Writer — The closest writing platform. This one corrects writing; Writer produces content. Both are not legal-specific. |
Read the Fireflies.ai record → · Read the Grammarly Business record →