COMPARISON · Immigration-specific
Drafty AI vs Visalaw.ai
Immigration-specific tools compared on price path and data-handling statements. This page places vendor-published facts side by side. It does not rank the products or state which is better.
| Fact | Drafty AI | Visalaw.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Immigration-specific | Immigration-specific |
| Vendor | Drafty AI | Visalaw.ai |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Price path | Public price: Vendor publishes a pricing page. | Public price: Vendor publishes a pricing page. |
| Confidentiality statement | “Your clients' data stays yours” | “Each customer's data is logically isolated from other customers' data within our platform.” |
| Training or data-use statement | No-training commitment: “And no training on your data, ever.” | No-training commitment: “We do not use Customer Data or Customer Content (queries and outputs) to train any AI models. Our third-party model providers are also contractually prohibited from training on customer data.” |
| Firm-size scope | Not stated | Solo, 2-5 |
| Named connections | Not stated | Not stated |
| Data location | Not stated | Not stated |
| Last checked | September 15, 2026 | September 15, 2026 |
Every value above is a dated observation from the vendor’s own published material. Open either tool page for the full evidence ledger and source links.
Editorial assessment, side by side
The rows below are the CounselAtlas editorial desk’s own reading, not vendor statements. They restate what each vendor published and add no claim of its own. Neither column is a rating or a recommendation.
| Assessment | Drafty AI | Visalaw.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Reading the vendor's wording | The vendor's checked statements are short and direct: client data stays with the firm, and there is no training on it. Short statements are easy to read but carry less detail than longer published policies. | The vendor says each customer's data is logically isolated, and that it does not use customer data to train AI models, with third-party providers contractually prohibited from training on it. Both halves are stated, which is stronger than a training statement alone. |
| What adopting it costs | It is immigration-only and does not manage matters, so it slots into an existing stack rather than replacing one. The switching cost is low, and so is the disruption if you stop using it. | It is immigration-only, so it cannot be a firm's single tool for mixed practice. Within an immigration practice it replaces a research-and-drafting workflow rather than a case-management system, so the migration is bounded. |
| Closest alternative | Visalaw.ai — The research-and-drafting workspace. This one is the drafting specialist; that one adds research. | Drafty AI — The drafting specialist. This one adds research to drafting; that one focuses on drafting. |