Drafting & review
Contractbook
Contract automation, templates, and signing for business teams.
Last observed 42 days ago. Records are treated as awaiting re-check after ninety days.
Only some data-handling statements were found. The checked sources did not contain all three of a confidentiality, training, and data-location statement. That is a gap in what the vendor publishes, not a finding about the product. Ask the vendor directly, or weigh it however your firm sees fit.
Editorial assessment
Contract automation and signing with a published encryption and audit statement.
This section is the CounselAtlas editorial desk’s own reading of the dated facts below. It is not a vendor statement, not a rating, and not a recommendation. Every product fact it rests on is recorded with a source in the record.
What it is
Contract automation, templates, and signing for business teams. The vendor publishes its encryption standard and states it complies with the SOC 2 auditing procedure.
What it is not
It is not a law-firm practice-management platform and it is not an e-discovery tool. It is built around contract automation for business teams.
Who it tends to fit
- Businesses and in-house teams that manage contracts at volume
- Teams that want templates, automation, and signing in one place
- Teams that want a published encryption statement
Who it tends not to fit
- Litigation practices looking for research or case assessment
- Solo attorneys with few contracts
- Firms looking for matter management
What to ask before you buy
- What is the price, and is it per seat?
- Which data region hosts my contracts?
- How does the automation handle non-standard clauses?
- What does export look like if I leave?
Limits in the record
- The vendor does not publish a price in the checked source.
- It is built for business teams, so legal-specific workflow depth may be limited.
How it sits in Drafting & review
Inside drafting and review, this is the automation-and-signing option alongside Juro. The difference is emphasis: this one leads with templates and signing rather than AI review.
Reading the vendor’s wording
The vendor states that only accounts with a verified email and phone number can create and sign contracts, that it uses SHA-256 with RSA encryption, and that it complies with the SOC 2 auditing procedure. It does not publish a training statement or a data-location statement in the checked source.
How to evaluate it in a trial
- Ask for the price and whether it is per seat.
- Ask which data region hosts your contracts.
- Test how the automation handles a non-standard clause.
- Ask what export looks like if you leave.
What adopting it costs
It is built for business teams, so adopting it means moving contract templates and signing into a new tool. The checked source does not name a hosting region, so settle that before signing.
Closest alternative
Juro — The closest automation-and-collaboration peer. This one leads with templates and signing; Juro leads with collaboration.
The record
Everything below is a dated observation from the vendor’s own published material. Each line links to the page it came from so you can confirm it yourself.
What we verified
- Vendor
- Contractbook. Observed September 21, 2026 · Vendor page ↗
- Price path
- Contact sales: No public price was located in the checked vendor source. Observed September 21, 2026 · Source ↗
- What it does
- Transactional, Corporate. Contractbook presents contract automation and signing for business teams. Observed September 21, 2026 · Source ↗
- Firm-size scope
- Not stated. Observed September 21, 2026 · Checked page ↗
- Connections
- Not stated. Observed September 21, 2026 · Checked page ↗
- Data location
- Not stated. Observed September 21, 2026 · Source ↗