COMPARISON · Document management & e-discovery
Casepoint vs Relativity aiR
E-discovery platforms compared on the government authorisations each vendor publishes and its data-handling wording. This page places vendor-published facts side by side. It does not rank the products or state which is better.
| Fact | Casepoint | Relativity aiR |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document management & e-discovery | Document management & e-discovery |
| Vendor | Casepoint | Relativity |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Price path | Contact sales: No public price was located in the checked vendor source. | Contact sales: No public price was located in the checked vendor source. |
| Confidentiality statement | “Casepoint holds FedRAMP® Moderate and High authorizations, ISO 27001 certification, and DOD Impact Level 5 (IL5) and Impact Level 6 (IL6) authorizations. We're one of only six SaaS companies globally that are DOD IL6 Authorized.” | “Relativity's security page describes its security program and FedRAMP posture but does not state a quotable data-handling commitment in the checked source.” |
| Training or data-use statement | No-training commitment: “Casepoint holds FedRAMP® Moderate and High authorizations, ISO 27001 certification, and DOD Impact Level 5 (IL5) and Impact Level 6 (IL6) authorizations.” | No-training commitment: “Relativity's checked security page does not state a training or data-use commitment in a quotable sentence.” |
| Firm-size scope | Not stated | Not stated |
| Named connections | Not stated | Not stated |
| Data location | Built for the Most Secure Government, Legal, and Compliance Work. The only truly unified AI-powered platform for eDiscovery, FOIA, investigations, and compliance trusted by leading government agencies and enterprises. | FedRAMP-certified platform available; the checked page does not state a data-location commitment in a quotable sentence. |
| Last checked | September 21, 2026 | September 21, 2026 |
Every value above is a dated observation from the vendor’s own published material. Open either tool page for the full evidence ledger and source links.
Editorial assessment, side by side
The rows below are the CounselAtlas editorial desk’s own reading, not vendor statements. They restate what each vendor published and add no claim of its own. Neither column is a rating or a recommendation.
| Assessment | Casepoint | Relativity aiR |
|---|---|---|
| Reading the vendor's wording | The vendor states that it holds FedRAMP Moderate and High authorizations, ISO 27001 certification, and DOD Impact Level 5 and 6 authorizations, and that it is one of only six SaaS companies globally that are DOD IL6 authorized. This is the strongest published compliance posture in the directory. | The checked security page describes the vendor's security program and FedRAMP posture but does not state a quotable data-handling commitment. That is recorded as an absence, not a criticism; the vendor may publish it elsewhere. |
| What adopting it costs | It is a review and investigations platform, so adopting it does not require replacing matter management. The authorizations are the reason to choose it, and they also mean a longer procurement process. | It is embedded in RelativityOne, so adopting it means adopting that platform. The compliance posture is strong, but the lock-in is a platform lock-in rather than a point-tool lock-in. |
| Closest alternative | Everlaw — The closest commercial review platform. This one competes on government authorizations; Everlaw publishes a quotable security statement. | Everlaw — The cloud-native alternative. This one is the enterprise incumbent with FedRAMP posture; that one publishes a quotable security statement. |
Read the Casepoint record → · Read the Relativity aiR record →